PRESS BRIEFING WITH PRESS SECRETARY SEAN SPICER 04-10-17
Gary Franchi here – your lead anchor giving you the news that is often missed or completely ignored by the corporate controlled media machine…
- Wow, this clown doesn’t even believe his own bs, you can see it on his face. If the cause is so noble then why is there no real proof put forward, and if national security is the claim then you should be able to clarify what the threat actually is. Prove the source to the people – then act. You’re damn right I don’t support This, I’m jumping right off that train. We have no business in Syria and the rebels that did this the last time (killing time origin) were western backed. Why should we get behind someone because they believe something, what happened to proving your claim?
- I was always on my own train. I feel like self reliance is the best course of action because you will inevitably be let down sooner or later. However, I did feel like Trump was the best choice and therefore backed him because he stood (or said he stood for many of the things I do). Unfortunately, I don’t think we can trust anyone in government completely, and there are many schools of thought out there. As for where the weapons came from I cannot speculate on that as many have. I am simply looking for proof from those who made the claims as the burden of proof is on them. If Assad did this then fine, but without an investigation we won’t really know. As for former administrations I don’t agree with them either. The 2013 gas attack in Syria was found to be by the rebels after a UN investigation, and history has shown that even we (the US) will fabricate the excuses needed to meet our ends. It is for this reason that these situations require independent investigations that prove the claims. As I said before, the burden of proof is always on the accuser and should be verified by an independent third party.
- they bomb syria because the gas their people however the US GASES US EACH AND EVERY DAY WITH CHEMTRAILS IN THE SKY SOMEONE SAVE US